linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] hash addresses printed with %p

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2017 09:48:37 +0000
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] hash addresses printed with %p

On 4 December 2017 at 09:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:29:28PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>> On 12/04/17 at 08:36am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:02:16AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>> > > +#define __ATTR_IRUSR(_name) {                                            \
>> > > + .attr   = { .name = __stringify(_name), .mode = S_IRUSR },      \
>> > > + .show   = _name##_show,                                         \
>> > > +}
>> >
>> > Ick, no, as others, including Linus, have said, using IRUSER is a pain
>> > in the ass to try to look up and remember what it is...
>> >
>> > Just use __ATTR() please, it should be fine for what you need to do,
>> > which is special-case a sysfs attribute.
>>
>> Hmm, I was hesitating to do that because it needs either long code
>> (over 80 chars) or some driver internal macros.
>>
>> There is already same issue in dmi-sysfs.c, it uses an internal macro
>> DMI_SYSFS_ATTR for 0400 attr.  I did not search all the kernel code,
>> there might be more for such special cases. Maybe we can add some
>> comment in sysfs.h to mention this is for some special case?
>>
>> I can do something similar as dmi sysfs code though.
>
> Hm, let me look at this this afternoon when I get through some stable
> patches, it shouldn't be that complex to need a whole new macro...
>

But wasn't that the whole point? That there is a macro that does what
you don't want (__ATTR_RO) and none that does what you do want?