[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOFm3uGYCssRV4D+Ht6NQLxFSijWt0dgsQEucJmVThjLqiD-oA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:41:08 +0100
From: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To: Oleksandr Shamray <oleksandrs@...lanox.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>, joel@....id.au,
Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, vadimp@...lanox.com,
system-sw-low-level@...lanox.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
openocd-devel-owner@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v13 2/4] drivers: jtag: Add Aspeed SoC 24xx and 25xx
families JTAG master driver
Oleksandr,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Oleksandr Shamray
<oleksandrs@...lanox.com> wrote:
[...]
> v12->v13
> Comments pointed by Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
> - Change jtag-aspeed.c licence type to
> SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note
> and reorder line with license in description
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/jtag/jtag-aspeed.c b/drivers/jtag/jtag-aspeed.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2ff46b0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/jtag/jtag-aspeed.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,784 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Sorry to nit pick on this but the comment style should be // here IMHO
This is what Linus requested, e.g.:
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
For reference, the doc is being written:Thomas (tglx) has already
submitted a first series of doc patches a few weeks ago. And AFAIK he
might be working on posting the updates soon, whenever his real time
clock yields a few cycles away from real time coding work ;)
See also these discussions with Linus [1][2][3], Thomas[4] and Greg[5]
on this and mostly related topics, where you will see Linus rationale
for the C++ comment stylle
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/2/715
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/25/125
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/25/133
[4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/2/805
[5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/19/165
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
Powered by blists - more mailing lists