[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171204125609.5931-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:56:09 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] netdevsim: make functions nsim_bpf_create_prog and nsim_bpf_destroy_prog static
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Functions nsim_bpf_create_prog and nsim_bpf_destroy_prog are local to the
source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'nsim_bpf_create_prog' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'nsim_bpf_destroy_prog' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
index 8e4398a50903..078d2c37a6c1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int nsim_xdp_set_prog(struct netdevsim *ns, struct netdev_bpf *bpf)
return 0;
}
-int nsim_bpf_create_prog(struct netdevsim *ns, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static int nsim_bpf_create_prog(struct netdevsim *ns, struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct nsim_bpf_bound_prog *state;
char name[16];
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ int nsim_bpf_create_prog(struct netdevsim *ns, struct bpf_prog *prog)
return 0;
}
-void nsim_bpf_destroy_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static void nsim_bpf_destroy_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct nsim_bpf_bound_prog *state;
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists