[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0248af7b-0459-2b77-e439-bfcdfebcd7f6@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 08:17:20 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, timur@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] PCI: make pci_flr_wait() generic and rename to
pci_dev_wait()
On 11/29/2017 12:38 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:20:24AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> Rev 3.1 Sec 2.3.1 Request Handling Rules:
>> Valid reset conditions after which a device is permitted to return CRS
>> are:
>> * Cold, Warm, and Hot Resets,
>> * FLR
>> * A reset initiated in response to a D3hot to D0 uninitialized
>>
>> Try to reuse FLR implementation towards other reset types.
>
> Should we keep a helper for the FLR wait? If not I guess the reference
> for AF_FLR should be the PCI spec, not the PCIE spec.
>
Bjorn,
what is your opinion?
Sinan
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists