linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Rewrite sme_populate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171204145755.6xu2w6a6og56rq5v@node.shutemov.name>
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:57:55 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Rewrite sme_populate_pgd() in a more sensible way

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 08:19:11AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 12/4/2017 5:23 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > sme_populate_pgd() open-codes a lot of things that are not needed to be
> > open-coded.
> > 
> > Let's rewrite it in a more stream-lined way.
> > 
> > This would also buy us boot-time switching between support between
> > paging modes, when rest of the pieces will be upstream.
> 
> Hi Kirill,
> 
> Unfortunately, some of these can't be changed.  The use of p4d_offset(),
> pud_offset(), etc., use non-identity mapped virtual addresses which cause
> failures at this point of the boot process.

Wat? Virtual address is virtual address. p?d_offset() doesn't care about
what mapping you're using.

> Also, calls such as __p4d(), __pud(), etc., are part of the paravirt
> support and can't be used yet, either. 

Yeah, I missed this. native_make_p?d() has to be used instead.

> I can take a closer look at some of the others (p*d_none() and
> p*d_large()) which make use of the native_ macros, but my worry would be
> that these get changed in the future to the non-native calls and then
> boot failures occur.

If you want to avoid paravirt altogher for whole compilation unit, one
more option would be to put #undef CONFIG_PARAVIRT before all includes.
That's hack, but it works. We already use this in arch/x86/boot/compressed
code.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov