linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: longhaul: Set transition_delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1936974.loJEzqH07r@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:03:41 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "4 . 14+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: longhaul: Set transition_delay_us to 20 ms

On Wednesday, November 29, 2017 7:59:27 AM CET Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
> > > index c46a12df40dd..56eafcb07859 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/longhaul.c
> > > @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int longhaul_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > >         if ((longhaul_version != TYPE_LONGHAUL_V1) && (scale_voltage != 0))
> > >                 longhaul_setup_voltagescaling();
> > >
> > > -       policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 200000;    /* nsec */
> > > +       policy->transition_delay_us = 20000;    /* usec */
> > >
> > >         return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, longhaul_table);
> > >  }
> > > --
> > 
> > Meelis, please check if this fixes the shutdown issue you have
> > reported recently.
> 
> Yes, but not today - hopefully tomorrow.

Any news?

I'd like to push the fix for 4.15 shortly if it works for you (I don't
see why it wouldn't work, but still I'd prefer it to be actually tested).

Thanks,
Rafael