linux-kernel - Re: polarity inversion on LS1021a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6588111.hDmIEKzSZ3@ws-stein>
Date:   Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:04:44 +0100
From:   Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: polarity inversion on LS1021a

On Monday, December 4, 2017, 4:37:20 PM CET Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 04/12/17 15:31, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > On Monday, December 4, 2017, 4:11:06 PM CET Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> >> The LS1021A has a standard GIC-400, but allows inverting the polarity of
> >> six external interrupt lines via a certain register, effectively
> >> supporting IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW and IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING for those.
> >>
> >> I'm trying to figure out how one would add support for this. The patch
> >> below works but is obviously just meant to help show what I mean, so
> >> please don't comment on all the things that are wrong with it.
> >>
> >> It feels wrong to create a whole new irqchip driver copy-pasting the
> >> entire irg-gic.c, but I can't figure out how and where one could hook
> >> into the existing one. Any pointers on how to do this properly will be
> >> greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > In my opinion a new irqchip is still required, but solely for modifying
> > SCFG_INTPCR depending on IRQ_TYPE_*
> > You would need to insert it as a cascading interrupt chip in device tree.
> > You also need to protect accesses to this register using a spinlock.
> > This is at least my idea how I would have done it, though never got time
> > for it.
> Almost. See my earlier reply. You just need a very minimal driver that
> only takes care of the polarity thing. Nobody needs to see yet another
> GIC driver...

Ah, maybe I should have made that more clear. Of course only a rather simple
driver for that single register is needed. The driver needs to handle the
infamous big-little-endian mismatch in ls1021a.

Best regards,
Alexander