lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:04:45 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i: a64: Add 2x
 fixed post-divider to MMC module clocks

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:25 AM, André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> wrote:
> On 04/12/17 05:19, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a small fix to get MMC performance up to proper speeds on the
>
> Maybe a small fix for a skilled developer, but a giant leap for all
> users ;-)
> MMC performance goes from: (4.15-rc1)
>
> SD: Timing buffered disk reads:   36 MB in  3.17 seconds =  11.35 MB/sec
> eMMC: Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in  3.03 seconds =  21.81 MB/sec
>
> to: (4.15-rc2 plus those two patches)
>
> SD: Timing buffered disk reads:  68 MB in  3.01 seconds =   22.61 MB/sec
> eMMC: Timing buffered disk reads: 132 MB in  3.01 seconds = 43.80 MB/sec
>
> So yes, factor of two ...
>
> Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
>
> Given the impact I wonder if this is a candidate for stable as well.

It could. But then again, nothing was broken. And it depends on the first
patch. I'm not sure stable would like that.

>
>> A64. According to the BSP kernel, the MMC module clocks have a /2 fixed
>> post-divider between the clock output and the MMC module, like what
>> we've seen with the "new MMC timing mode" on the A83T, but the A64 does
>> not have the mode switch.
>>
>> Sub-par performance was observed on the Banana Pi M64 eMMC. It only
>> reached half the read throughput of other Banana Pi boards, using a
>> standard sequential readout with a large block size. After these
>> patches, the performance is up to spec.
>>
>> The A64 can also do DDR transfer modes, but the clock delay config
>> registers in the MMC module are different from what we've seen so
>> far.
>
> But the BSP doesn't set those as well, does it? I mean to remember that
> they were all zero, expect for HS200/HS400?

What I meant was we should make it clear in the mmc driver that this
is another new configuration mechanism that is different from the
previous ones.

ChenYu

>
> Thanks!
> Andre.
>
>> One can just force enable DDR modes without tuning the delays,
>> and it does work. Proper support for this is left for another time.
>>
>>
>> ChenYu
>>
>> Chen-Yu Tsai (2):
>>   clk: sunxi-ng: Support fixed post-dividers on MP style clocks
>>   clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i: a64: Add 2x fixed post-divider to MMC module
>>     clocks
>>
>>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mp.c         | 20 ++++++++++--
>>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mp.h         | 24 +++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ