[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v65Ps-z=ijMARxxxAX3h7+b_gQ-bh2B8AO6t5mpPdJNhtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:04:45 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i: a64: Add 2x
fixed post-divider to MMC module clocks
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:25 AM, André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> wrote:
> On 04/12/17 05:19, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a small fix to get MMC performance up to proper speeds on the
>
> Maybe a small fix for a skilled developer, but a giant leap for all
> users ;-)
> MMC performance goes from: (4.15-rc1)
>
> SD: Timing buffered disk reads: 36 MB in 3.17 seconds = 11.35 MB/sec
> eMMC: Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in 3.03 seconds = 21.81 MB/sec
>
> to: (4.15-rc2 plus those two patches)
>
> SD: Timing buffered disk reads: 68 MB in 3.01 seconds = 22.61 MB/sec
> eMMC: Timing buffered disk reads: 132 MB in 3.01 seconds = 43.80 MB/sec
>
> So yes, factor of two ...
>
> Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
>
> Given the impact I wonder if this is a candidate for stable as well.
It could. But then again, nothing was broken. And it depends on the first
patch. I'm not sure stable would like that.
>
>> A64. According to the BSP kernel, the MMC module clocks have a /2 fixed
>> post-divider between the clock output and the MMC module, like what
>> we've seen with the "new MMC timing mode" on the A83T, but the A64 does
>> not have the mode switch.
>>
>> Sub-par performance was observed on the Banana Pi M64 eMMC. It only
>> reached half the read throughput of other Banana Pi boards, using a
>> standard sequential readout with a large block size. After these
>> patches, the performance is up to spec.
>>
>> The A64 can also do DDR transfer modes, but the clock delay config
>> registers in the MMC module are different from what we've seen so
>> far.
>
> But the BSP doesn't set those as well, does it? I mean to remember that
> they were all zero, expect for HS200/HS400?
What I meant was we should make it clear in the mmc driver that this
is another new configuration mechanism that is different from the
previous ones.
ChenYu
>
> Thanks!
> Andre.
>
>> One can just force enable DDR modes without tuning the delays,
>> and it does work. Proper support for this is left for another time.
>>
>>
>> ChenYu
>>
>> Chen-Yu Tsai (2):
>> clk: sunxi-ng: Support fixed post-dividers on MP style clocks
>> clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i: a64: Add 2x fixed post-divider to MMC module
>> clocks
>>
>> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mp.c | 20 ++++++++++--
>> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mp.h | 24 +++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists