lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000c01d36da4$7a9efbe0$6fdcf3a0$@samsung.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:38:01 +0800
From:   "LiFan" <fanofcode.li@...sung.com>
To:     "'Chao Yu'" <yuchao0@...wei.com>, "'Chao Yu'" <chao@...nel.org>,
        "'Jaegeuk Kim'" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: use unlikely for release case

Since the variable release is only nonzero when another unlikely
case occurs, use unlikely() on it seems logical.

Signed-off-by: Fan li <fanofcode.li@...sung.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 71fbba96..0f01af0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
 
-	if (release)
+	if (unlikely(release))
 		dquot_release_reservation_block(inode, release);
 	f2fs_i_blocks_write(inode, *count, true, true);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.7.4


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ