[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171205085614.tyyvu4ultnctbzw4@nora.maurer-it.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:57:06 +0100
From: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@...xmox.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>, hch@....de,
jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
jthumshirn@...e.de, bart.vanassche@....com,
bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jth@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][v4.13.y][v4.14.y] scsi: libsas: allow async aborts
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:09:37PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 11/16/2017 11:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
> > bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
> >
> > 909657615d9b ("scsi: libsas: allow async aborts")
> >
> >
> > The regression was introduced as of v4.12-rc1, and it still exists in
> > 4.14 mainline.
> >
> > I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
> > you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
> > or would it be best to submit a revert request?
> >
> I'll be checking what's going on there.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
Any news about this regression? Any traces / data affected users can
provide?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists