lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:58:35 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gklkml16@...il.com>
Cc:     "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
        mark.rutland@....com,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, jnair@...iumnetworks.com,
        Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        Robert Richter <Robert.Richter@...ium.com>,
        "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] perf utils: use pmu->is_uncore to detect PMU
 UNCORE devices

Em Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:42:30PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni escreveu:
> thanks Jin Yao for point this out.
> 
> looks like logic of leveraging uncore device type(which i have changed
> in v9) does not go well
> with some json events of x86.
> can you please try below diff(logic used till v8), which keeps the
> original logic of identifying core/cpu PMUs.

This seems space mangled :-\

- Arnaldo
 
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> index 5ad8a18..57e38fd 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> @@ -538,6 +538,34 @@ static bool pmu_is_uncore(const char *name)
>  }
> 
>  /*
> + *  PMU CORE devices have different name other than cpu in sysfs on some
> + *  platforms. looking for possible sysfs files to identify as core device.
> + */
> +static int is_pmu_core(const char *name)
> +{
> + struct stat st;
> + char path[PATH_MAX];
> + const char *sysfs = sysfs__mountpoint();
> +
> + if (!sysfs)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Look for cpu sysfs (x86 and others) */
> + scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/cpu", sysfs);
> + if ((stat(path, &st) == 0) &&
> + (strncmp(name, "cpu", strlen("cpu")) == 0))
> + return 1;
> +
> + /* Look for cpu sysfs (specific to arm) */
> + scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/%s/cpus",
> + sysfs, name);
> + if (stat(path, &st) == 0)
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Return the CPU id as a raw string.
>   *
>   * Each architecture should provide a more precise id string that
> @@ -641,7 +669,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head
> *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
>   break;
>   }
> 
> - if (pmu->is_uncore) {
> + if (!is_pmu_core(name)) {
>   /* check for uncore devices */
>   if (pe->pmu == NULL)
>   continue;
> 
> i have tried this diff on my x86 PC(haswell) and looks to be ok.
> please confirm your testing on skylake.
> 
> gkulkarni@...c25>perf>> ./perf stat --per-thread -p 12663 -M CPI,IPC sleep 1
> 
>  Performance counter stats for process id '12663':
> 
>             bash-12663               278,886      inst_retired.any:u
>             bash-12663               482,284      cycles:u
>             bash-12663               278,886      inst_retired.any:u
>             bash-12663               483,597
> cpu_clk_unhalted.thread:u
> 
>        1.000923760 seconds time elapsed
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Jin, Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Kulkarni, Arnaldo,
> >
> > This patch has been merged in perf/core branch today.
> >
> > But I see a regression issue when I run the 'perf stat'.
> >
> > With bisect checking, I locate to this patch.
> >
> > commit ad8737a08973f5dca632bdd63cf2abc99670e540
> > Author: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>
> > Date:   Tue Oct 17 00:02:20 2017 +0530
> >
> >     perf pmu: Use pmu->is_uncore to detect UNCORE devices
> >
> > For example (on Intel skylake desktop),
> >
> > 1. The correct output should be (without this patch):
> >
> > root@skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread -p 1754 -M CPI,IPC
> > ^C
> >  Performance counter stats for process id '1754':
> >
> >           vmstat-1754              1,882,798      inst_retired.any     #
> > 0.8 CPI
> >           vmstat-1754              1,589,720      cycles
> >           vmstat-1754              1,882,798      inst_retired.any     #
> > 1.2 IPC
> >           vmstat-1754              1,589,720      cpu_clk_unhalted.thread
> >
> >        2.647443167 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > 2. With this patch, the output will be:
> >
> > root@skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread -p 1754 -M CPI,IPC
> > ^C
> >  Performance counter stats for process id '1754':
> >
> >           vmstat-1754              1,945,589      inst_retired.any
> >           vmstat-1754        <not supported>      inst_retired.any
> >           vmstat-1754              1,609,892      cycles
> >           vmstat-1754              1,945,589      inst_retired.any
> >           vmstat-1754        <not supported>      inst_retired.any
> >           vmstat-1754              1,609,892      cpu_clk_unhalted.thread
> >           vmstat-1754        <not supported>      cpu_clk_unhalted.thread
> >
> >        3.051274166 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > Could you please help to take a look?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jin Yao
> >
> >
> > On 10/17/2017 2:32 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> >>
> >> PMU CORE devices are identified using sysfs filename cpu, however
> >> on some platforms(like arm/arm64), PMU CORE sysfs name is not cpu.
> >> Hence cpu cannot be used to differentiate PMU CORE/UNCORE devices.
> >>
> >> commit:
> >>   66ec1191 ("perf pmu: Unbreak perf record for arm/arm64 with events with
> >> explicit PMU")
> >>
> >> has introduced pmu->is_uncore, which is set to PMU UNCORE devices only.
> >> Adding changes to use pmu->is_uncore to identify UNCORE devices.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> >> Tested-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>
> >> ---
> >>   tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 11 +++++++----
> >>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> index 8b17db5..9110718 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> >> @@ -603,7 +603,6 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head
> >> *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> >>          */
> >>         i = 0;
> >>         while (1) {
> >> -               const char *pname;
> >>                 pe = &map->table[i++];
> >>                 if (!pe->name) {
> >> @@ -612,9 +611,13 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head
> >> *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> >>                         break;
> >>                 }
> >>   -             pname = pe->pmu ? pe->pmu : "cpu";
> >> -               if (strncmp(pname, name, strlen(pname)))
> >> -                       continue;
> >> +               if (pmu->is_uncore) {
> >> +                       /* check for uncore devices */
> >> +                       if (pe->pmu == NULL)
> >> +                               continue;
> >> +                       if (strncmp(pe->pmu, name, strlen(pe->pmu)))
> >> +                               continue;
> >> +               }
> >>                 /* need type casts to override 'const' */
> >>                 __perf_pmu__new_alias(head, NULL, (char *)pe->name,
> >>
> >
> 
> thanks
> Ganapat

Powered by blists - more mailing lists