[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171205153624.amxarwpbbpdiflpc@linux-n805>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:36:24 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: waitqueue lockdep annotation
On Tue, 05 Dec 2017, Jason Baron wrote:
>On 12/01/2017 06:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> True. The patch below survives the amazing complex booting and starting
>> systemd with lockdep enabled test. Do we have something resembling a
>> epoll test suite?
>>
>
>I don't think we have any in the kernel tree proper (other than some
>selftests using epoll) but there are tests in ltp and some performance
>tests such as:
>
>http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c
>http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/pipetest.c
fyi I'm working on adding epoll to perf-bench, hope to have patches soon.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists