[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171205154831.GR2421075@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:48:31 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, w@...qinren.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: fix comment in __mark_inode_dirty
Hello, Wang.
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:52:54AM -0500, Wang Long wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com>
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index cea4836..8d477cf 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
> trace_writeback_dirty_inode_enqueue(inode);
>
> /*
> - * If this is the first dirty inode for this bdi,
> + * If this is the first dirty inode for this wb,
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
This probably should go through the block tree tho. Please cc Jens
Axboe.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists