lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:49:10 -0500
From:   Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
To:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc:     Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Hubbe, Allen" <Allen.Hubbe@....com>,
        "S-k, Shyam-sundar" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
        "Yu, Xiangliang" <Xiangliang.Yu@....com>,
        Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>, Sergey.Semin@...latforms.ru,
        linux-ntb <linux-ntb@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] NTB: Rename NTB messaging API methods

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com> wrote:
> There is a common methods signature form used over all the NTB API
> like functions naming scheme, arguments names and order, etc.
> Recently added NTB messaging API IO callbacks were named a bit
> different so should be renamed to be in compliance with the rest
> of the API. The changes are made in a way so the developers won't
> be able to compile their code without being informed by the compiler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ntb/hw/idt/ntb_hw_idt.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
>  include/linux/ntb.h             | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/hw/idt/ntb_hw_idt.c b/drivers/ntb/hw/idt/ntb_hw_idt.c
> index 0cd79f367f7c..6fb87c0f0d97 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/hw/idt/ntb_hw_idt.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/hw/idt/ntb_hw_idt.c
> @@ -1744,20 +1744,19 @@ static int idt_ntb_msg_clear_mask(struct ntb_dev *ntb, u64 mask_bits)
>   * idt_ntb_msg_read() - read message register with specified index
>   *                     (NTB API callback)
>   * @ntb:       NTB device context.
> - * @midx:      Message register index
>   * @pidx:      OUT - Port index of peer device a message retrieved from
> - * @msg:       OUT - Data
> + * @midx:      Message register index
>   *
>   * Read data from the specified message register and source register.
>   *
> - * Return: zero on success, negative error if invalid argument passed.
> + * Return: inbound message register value.
>   */
> -static int idt_ntb_msg_read(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int *pidx, u32 *msg)
> +static u32 idt_ntb_msg_read(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int *pidx, int midx)
>  {
>         struct idt_ntb_dev *ndev = to_ndev_ntb(ntb);
>
>         if (midx < 0 || IDT_MSG_CNT <= midx)
> -               return -EINVAL;
> +               return (u32)-1;

Please don't do this.  If this is an error return standard error
number.  And why are we casting to an unsigned int now?

>
>         /* Retrieve source port index of the message */
>         if (pidx != NULL) {
> @@ -1772,18 +1771,15 @@ static int idt_ntb_msg_read(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int *pidx, u32 *msg)
>         }
>
>         /* Retrieve data of the corresponding message register */
> -       if (msg != NULL)
> -               *msg = idt_nt_read(ndev, ntdata_tbl.msgs[midx].in);
> -
> -       return 0;
> +       return idt_nt_read(ndev, ntdata_tbl.msgs[midx].in);
>  }
>
>  /*
> - * idt_ntb_msg_write() - write data to the specified message register
> - *                      (NTB API callback)
> + * idt_ntb_peer_msg_write() - write data to the specified message register
> + *                           (NTB API callback)
>   * @ntb:       NTB device context.
> - * @midx:      Message register index
>   * @pidx:      Port index of peer device a message being sent to
> + * @midx:      Message register index
>   * @msg:       Data to send
>   *
>   * Just try to send data to a peer. Message status register should be
> @@ -1791,7 +1787,8 @@ static int idt_ntb_msg_read(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int *pidx, u32 *msg)
>   *
>   * Return: zero on success, negative error if invalid argument passed.
>   */
> -static int idt_ntb_msg_write(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int pidx, u32 msg)
> +static int idt_ntb_peer_msg_write(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int pidx, int midx,
> +                                 u32 msg)
>  {
>         struct idt_ntb_dev *ndev = to_ndev_ntb(ntb);
>         unsigned long irqflags;
> @@ -2058,7 +2055,7 @@ static const struct ntb_dev_ops idt_ntb_ops = {
>         .msg_set_mask           = idt_ntb_msg_set_mask,
>         .msg_clear_mask         = idt_ntb_msg_clear_mask,
>         .msg_read               = idt_ntb_msg_read,
> -       .msg_write              = idt_ntb_msg_write
> +       .peer_msg_write         = idt_ntb_peer_msg_write
>  };
>
>  /*
> @@ -2269,7 +2266,7 @@ static ssize_t idt_dbgfs_info_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
>                  "Message data:\n");
>         for (idx = 0; idx < IDT_MSG_CNT; idx++) {
>                 int src;
> -               (void)idt_ntb_msg_read(&ndev->ntb, idx, &src, &data);
> +               data = idt_ntb_msg_read(&ndev->ntb, &src, idx);
>                 off += scnprintf(strbuf + off, size - off,
>                         "\t%hhu. 0x%08x from peer %hhu (Port %hhu)\n",
>                         idx, data, src, ndev->peers[src].port);
> diff --git a/include/linux/ntb.h b/include/linux/ntb.h
> index c308964777eb..c1646f2c6344 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ntb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ntb.h
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static inline int ntb_ctx_ops_is_valid(const struct ntb_ctx_ops *ops)
>   * @msg_set_mask:      See ntb_msg_set_mask().
>   * @msg_clear_mask:    See ntb_msg_clear_mask().
>   * @msg_read:          See ntb_msg_read().
> - * @msg_write:         See ntb_msg_write().
> + * @peer_msg_write:    See ntb_peer_msg_write().
>   */
>  struct ntb_dev_ops {
>         int (*port_number)(struct ntb_dev *ntb);
> @@ -321,8 +321,8 @@ struct ntb_dev_ops {
>         int (*msg_clear_sts)(struct ntb_dev *ntb, u64 sts_bits);
>         int (*msg_set_mask)(struct ntb_dev *ntb, u64 mask_bits);
>         int (*msg_clear_mask)(struct ntb_dev *ntb, u64 mask_bits);
> -       int (*msg_read)(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int *pidx, u32 *msg);
> -       int (*msg_write)(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int pidx, u32 msg);
> +       u32 (*msg_read)(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int *pidx, int midx);
> +       int (*peer_msg_write)(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int pidx, int midx, u32 msg);
>  };
>
>  static inline int ntb_dev_ops_is_valid(const struct ntb_dev_ops *ops)
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static inline int ntb_dev_ops_is_valid(const struct ntb_dev_ops *ops)
>                 /* !ops->msg_set_mask == !ops->msg_count        && */
>                 /* !ops->msg_clear_mask == !ops->msg_count      && */
>                 !ops->msg_read == !ops->msg_count               &&
> -               !ops->msg_write == !ops->msg_count              &&
> +               !ops->peer_msg_write == !ops->msg_count         &&
>                 1;
>  }
>
> @@ -1459,31 +1459,29 @@ static inline int ntb_msg_clear_mask(struct ntb_dev *ntb, u64 mask_bits)
>  }
>
>  /**
> - * ntb_msg_read() - read message register with specified index
> + * ntb_msg_read() - read inbound message register with specified index
>   * @ntb:       NTB device context.
> - * @midx:      Message register index
>   * @pidx:      OUT - Port index of peer device a message retrieved from
> - * @msg:       OUT - Data
> + * @midx:      Message register index
>   *
>   * Read data from the specified message register. Source port index of a
>   * message is retrieved as well.
>   *
> - * Return: Zero on success, otherwise a negative error number.
> + * Return: The value of the inbound message register.
>   */
> -static inline int ntb_msg_read(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int *pidx,
> -                              u32 *msg)
> +static inline u32 ntb_msg_read(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int *pidx, int midx)
>  {
>         if (!ntb->ops->msg_read)
> -               return -EINVAL;
> +               return ~(u32)0;

Same here but in a different way.  Please revert this.

>
> -       return ntb->ops->msg_read(ntb, midx, pidx, msg);
> +       return ntb->ops->msg_read(ntb, pidx, midx);
>  }
>
>  /**
> - * ntb_msg_write() - write data to the specified message register
> + * ntb_peer_msg_write() - write data to the specified peer message register
>   * @ntb:       NTB device context.
> - * @midx:      Message register index
>   * @pidx:      Port index of peer device a message being sent to
> + * @midx:      Message register index
>   * @msg:       Data to send
>   *
>   * Send data to a specified peer device using the defined message register.
> @@ -1492,13 +1490,13 @@ static inline int ntb_msg_read(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int *pidx,
>   *
>   * Return: Zero on success, otherwise a negative error number.
>   */
> -static inline int ntb_msg_write(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int midx, int pidx,
> -                               u32 msg)
> +static inline int ntb_peer_msg_write(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int pidx, int midx,
> +                                    u32 msg)
>  {
> -       if (!ntb->ops->msg_write)
> +       if (!ntb->ops->peer_msg_write)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       return ntb->ops->msg_write(ntb, midx, pidx, msg);
> +       return ntb->ops->peer_msg_write(ntb, pidx, midx, msg);
>  }
>
>  #endif
> --
> 2.12.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ