linux-kernel - Re: [v2] mfd: stm32: Adopt SPDX identifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171205172811.GA5534@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2017 18:28:11 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Subject: Re: [v2] mfd: stm32: Adopt SPDX identifier

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 09:23:37AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:24:18PM +0100, benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org wrote:
> > Add SPDX identifier
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/stm32-lptimer.c       | 6 +-----
> >  drivers/mfd/stm32-timers.c        | 4 +---
> >  include/linux/mfd/stm32-lptimer.h | 6 +-----
> >  include/linux/mfd/stm32-timers.h  | 4 +---
> >  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stm32-lptimer.c b/drivers/mfd/stm32-lptimer.c
> > index 075330a25f61..a00f99f36559 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/stm32-lptimer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/stm32-lptimer.c
> > @@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >  /*
> 
> I have been wondering - why is the SPDX identifier for the most part added
> as separate C++ comment at the beginning of the file, and not inline with
> the rest of the top comments ?  SPDX doesn't mandate this - the examples
> I can find on the SPDX web site all show it inline. Is there a special
> Linux kernel convention ?

See the patch series from Thomas that answers this question for you by
adding documentation to the kernel explaining it all :)

thanks,

greg k-h