[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171206211205.t4qf6hqmzr74stg7@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:12:05 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@...il.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eeprom: at25: Add DT support for 25lc040
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:04:21AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an
> >> odd number of address bits. This patch series adds support for
> >> instantiating such devices from DT.
> >>
> >> Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in
> >> include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist?
> >> Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)?
> >>
> >> This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Geert Uytterhoeven (3):
> >> eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits
> >> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/
> >> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values
> >
> > 2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind.
>
> Thanks, I don't mind.
Both applied.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists