lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:12:05 -0600 From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@...il.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eeprom: at25: Add DT support for 25lc040 On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:04:21AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an > >> odd number of address bits. This patch series adds support for > >> instantiating such devices from DT. > >> > >> Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in > >> include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist? > >> Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)? > >> > >> This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Geert Uytterhoeven (3): > >> eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits > >> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/ > >> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values > > > > 2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind. > > Thanks, I don't mind. Both applied. Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists