lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:12:05 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@...il.com>,
        Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eeprom: at25: Add DT support for 25lc040

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:04:21AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an
> >> odd number of address bits.  This patch series adds support for
> >> instantiating such devices from DT.
> >>
> >> Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in
> >> include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist?
> >> Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)?
> >>
> >> This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Geert Uytterhoeven (3):
> >>   eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits
> >>   dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/
> >>   dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values
> >
> > 2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind.
> 
> Thanks, I don't mind.

Both applied.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists