[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171206.163545.906490902377440615.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 16:35:45 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org
Cc: grygorii.strashko@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpdma: rate is not changed
- correct case
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 16:41:18 +0200
> If rate is the same as set it's correct case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
> ---
> Based on net-next/master
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
> index e4d6edf..dbe9167 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
> @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ int cpdma_chan_set_rate(struct cpdma_chan *ch, u32 rate)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (ch->rate == rate)
> - return rate;
> + return 0;
Looking at the one and only caller of this function, cpsw_ndo_set_tx_maxrate, it
makes sure this can never, ever, happen.
So I would instead remove this check completely since it can never trigger.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists