linux-kernel - Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:09:37 +0100
From:   Maarten Lankhorst <dev@...ankhorst.nl>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3

Op 06-12-17 om 13:46 schreef Thomas Gleixner:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 06-12-17 om 13:15 schreef Michal Hocko:
>>> "No irq handler" part looks a bit scary (maybe related to lost affinity
>>> messages?) but the following messages look quite as well. Is this
>>> something known? The system seems to be up and running without any
>>> visible issues.
>> Another reproducer for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198033 ?
>> Symptoms are similar..
> Well, the spurious interrupt is one thing, but you obviously lose
> interrupts for some reason.
>
> Did you ever manage to get the data out which I asked for?
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx
>
Yes, sent this out about an hour ago

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/6/215

Cheers,

Maarten