[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171206142305.GA15920@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:23:05 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Marcus Wolf <marcus.wolf@...rthome-wolf.de>
Cc: Marcus Wolf <linux@...f-entwicklungen.de>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: Fixes issue with bit shift in
rf69_get_modulation
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:02:13PM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.12.2017 um 11:02 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:13:56PM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote:
> > > Fixes issue with bit shift in rf69_get_modulation
> >
> > What "issue"?
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcus Wolf <linux@...f-entwicklungen.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
> > > index 290b419..c945b4b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c
> > > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ enum modulation rf69_get_modulation(struct spi_device *spi)
> > > currentValue = READ_REG(REG_DATAMODUL);
> > > - switch (currentValue & MASK_DATAMODUL_MODULATION_TYPE >> 3) { // TODO improvement: change 3 to define
> > > + switch (currentValue & MASK_DATAMODUL_MODULATION_TYPE) {
> >
> > Doesn't this change the logic here?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> yes, it does.
>
> This is one of the very few changes to pi433 driver, that does not modify
> the architecture or optics of the code, but really fixes a bug. This
> function wasn't working from the very beginning, and we had already several
> reports and patches (from me and otheres), announcing or trying to fix the
> bug. But so far all patches were skipped for some reason.
>
>
> Please take the patch.
Ok, then this should go into 4.15-final, I'll queue it up to that tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists