linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: protect macro argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <450504e854cf68efff7f212c6bd66fe2@agner.ch>
Date:   Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:25:37 +0100
From:   Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     timur@...i.org, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, fabio.estevam@....com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: protect macro argument

On 2017-12-06 15:11, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:53:39PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> On 2017-08-07 09:08, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:36:57PM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote:
> 
>> Mark, you seem to have merged other patches for this driver, can you
>> merge this one too?
> 
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Well, it was not entirely content free since I added you/Liam to the
list of recipient which I missed in the initial patch. I probably should
have mentioned that.

I did not meant to bug people, just wanted to make sure the patch does
not falls through the cracks... After all, patch as well as the Ack
already more than 3 months old....

--
Stefan