[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANk1AXRFfV9dL+82RcdwRtwTwE9jdE5erZ8q8MUud4z_k6Fn=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:29:34 -0600
From: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, "mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>,
"linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"luwei.kang@...el.com" <luwei.kang@...el.com>,
"yi.z.zhang@...el.com" <yi.z.zhang@...el.com>,
Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@...el.com>,
Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@...el.com>,
Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@...el.com>,
Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@...el.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/21] fpga: add Intel FPGA DFL PCIe device
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:44 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> From: Wu Hao
>> Sent: 06 December 2017 05:30
> ...
>> > Regarding file names, it seems like the files added to drivers/fpga
>> > could be uniformly named dfl-*.[ch]. Some are fpga-dfl-*.[ch] while
>> > other are currently dfl-*.[ch] currently.
>
> They don't even want to do into a drivers/fgpa directory.
> Maybe drivers/dfl or drivers/dfl/intel
It's plugged into the fpga framework in drivers/fpga. This patchset
also handles reprogramming the fpga, not just the dfl style
enumeration. But your points about this being not just for FPGA are
interesting to me. Do you have a use for this that isn't
FPGA-centric?
Alan
>
> David
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists