lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:41:33 -0500
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/7] ACPI / bus: Introduce acpi_get_match_data()
 function

On 12/5/2017 5:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> OF has of_device_get_match_data() function to extract driver specific data
>> structure. Add a similar function for ACPI.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Not sure yet, sorry.

OK. no problem.

> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/bus.c   | 12 ++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/acpi.h |  6 ++++++
>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> index 4d0979e..b271eb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> @@ -785,6 +785,18 @@ const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *ids,
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_match_device);
>>
>> +void *acpi_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +       const struct acpi_device_id *match;
>> +
>> +       match = acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, dev);
> 
> Shouldn't this check dev->driver against NULL before dereferencing it?

I'm adding these checks. I realized that acpi_match_device() is not validating
the ids either.

--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -789,6 +789,12 @@ void *acpi_get_match_data(const struct device *dev)
 {
        const struct acpi_device_id *match;

+       if (!dev->driver)
+               return NULL;
+
+       if (!dev->driver->acpi_match_table)
+               return NULL;
+

I'll hold onto posting this until I hear back from Sakari.

Sinan

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists