lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:15:15 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "maintainer:X86" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
        Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
        "travis @ sgi . com" <travis@....com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/UV: make functions uv_handle_nmi and
 uv_nmi_setup_common static


* Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Functions uv_handle_nmi and uv_nmi_setup_common are local to the
> source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'uv_handle_nmi' was not declared. Should it be static?
> symbol 'uv_nmi_setup_common' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Please combine your three pending x86 Sparse fix patches (this one, the x86/vector 
one and the x86/mm one) into a single patch. They are trivial and should not be 
split into 3 patches.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists