lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171206171515.c6phtllfdw7nfbix@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:15:15 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "maintainer:X86" <x86@...nel.org>, Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>, Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>, "travis @ sgi . com" <travis@....com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/UV: make functions uv_handle_nmi and uv_nmi_setup_common static * Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> > > Functions uv_handle_nmi and uv_nmi_setup_common are local to the > source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static. > > Cleans up sparse warnings: > symbol 'uv_handle_nmi' was not declared. Should it be static? > symbol 'uv_nmi_setup_common' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> > --- > arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Please combine your three pending x86 Sparse fix patches (this one, the x86/vector one and the x86/mm one) into a single patch. They are trivial and should not be split into 3 patches. Thanks, Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists