[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <dd7ab590-f5bc-e7bb-6807-210c099072fe@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:34:51 -0600
From: Paul Clarke <pc@...ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: bhargavb <bhargavaramudu@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] perf-probe: Cut off the version suffix from event
name
On 12/07/2017 01:20 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Cut off the version suffix (e.g. @GLIBC_2.2.5 etc.) from
> automatic generated event name. This fixes wildcard event
> adding like below case;
>
> =====
> # perf probe -x /lib64/libc-2.25.so malloc*
> Internal error: "malloc_get_state@...BC_2" is wrong event name.
> Error: Failed to add events.
> =====
>
> This failure was caused by a versioned suffix symbol.
> With this fix, perf probe automatically cuts the
> suffix after @ as below.
>
> =====
> # ./perf probe -x /lib64/libc-2.25.so malloc*
> Added new events:
> probe_libc:malloc_printerr (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_consolidate (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_check (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_hook_ini (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_trim (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_usable_size (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_stats (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_info (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:mallochook (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_get_state (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
> probe_libc:malloc_set_state (on malloc* in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
>
> You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
>
> perf record -e probe_libc:malloc_set_state -aR sleep 1
>
> =====
I think this will still fall over for a case where there are multiple versions of the same base symbol, like:
$ nm /lib64/libc.so.6 | egrep ' sched_getaffinity'
0000000000134430 T sched_getaffinity@...BC_2.3.3
00000000000dcf00 T sched_getaffinity@@GLIBC_2.3.4
Should we retain the versioning string in some form? "sched_getaffinity--GLIBC_2.3.4"? Should we instead interpret the '@' symbol more flexibly, so maybe first assume it is a version string, and if not found, try to see if it's a valid "@SRC" specification?
PC
Powered by blists - more mailing lists