linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171207105855.0db6a7f8@lwn.net>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:58:55 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        david@...morbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation

On Tue,  5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:

> Some functions from refcount_t API provide different
> memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts.
> This adds a document outlining these differences (
> Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as
> some other minor improvements.

This seems generally good to me.  Did you want me to take it through the
docs tree (including the refcount.h change) or did you have some other
path in mind?

Thanks,

jon