linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: lan9303: Protect ALR operations with mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171207185604.30745-1-privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Date:   Thu,  7 Dec 2017 19:56:04 +0100
From:   Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
To:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: lan9303: Protect ALR operations with mutex

ALR table operations are a sequence of related register operations which
should be protected from concurrent access. The alr_cache should also be
protected. Add alr_mutex doing that.

Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 include/linux/dsa/lan9303.h    |  1 +
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
index ea59dadefb33..c1b004fa64d9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
@@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ static void lan9303_alr_loop(struct lan9303 *chip, alr_loop_cb_t *cb, void *ctx)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	mutex_lock(&chip->alr_mutex);
 	lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_SWE_ALR_CMD,
 				 LAN9303_ALR_CMD_GET_FIRST);
 	lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_SWE_ALR_CMD, 0);
@@ -606,6 +607,7 @@ static void lan9303_alr_loop(struct lan9303 *chip, alr_loop_cb_t *cb, void *ctx)
 					 LAN9303_ALR_CMD_GET_NEXT);
 		lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_SWE_ALR_CMD, 0);
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&chip->alr_mutex);
 }
 
 static void alr_reg_to_mac(u32 dat0, u32 dat1, u8 mac[6])
@@ -694,16 +696,20 @@ static int lan9303_alr_add_port(struct lan9303 *chip, const u8 *mac, int port,
 {
 	struct lan9303_alr_cache_entry *entr;
 
+	mutex_lock(&chip->alr_mutex);
 	entr = lan9303_alr_cache_find_mac(chip, mac);
 	if (!entr) { /*New entry */
 		entr = lan9303_alr_cache_find_free(chip);
-		if (!entr)
+		if (!entr) {
+			mutex_unlock(&chip->alr_mutex);
 			return -ENOSPC;
+		}
 		ether_addr_copy(entr->mac_addr, mac);
 	}
 	entr->port_map |= BIT(port);
 	entr->stp_override = stp_override;
 	lan9303_alr_set_entry(chip, mac, entr->port_map, stp_override);
+	mutex_unlock(&chip->alr_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -713,15 +719,18 @@ static int lan9303_alr_del_port(struct lan9303 *chip, const u8 *mac, int port)
 {
 	struct lan9303_alr_cache_entry *entr;
 
+	mutex_lock(&chip->alr_mutex);
 	entr = lan9303_alr_cache_find_mac(chip, mac);
 	if (!entr)
-		return 0;  /* no static entry found */
+		goto out;  /* no static entry found */
 
 	entr->port_map &= ~BIT(port);
 	if (entr->port_map == 0) /* zero means its free again */
 		eth_zero_addr(entr->mac_addr);
 	lan9303_alr_set_entry(chip, mac, entr->port_map, entr->stp_override);
 
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&chip->alr_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1323,6 +1332,7 @@ int lan9303_probe(struct lan9303 *chip, struct device_node *np)
 	int ret;
 
 	mutex_init(&chip->indirect_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&chip->alr_mutex);
 
 	lan9303_probe_reset_gpio(chip, np);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/dsa/lan9303.h b/include/linux/dsa/lan9303.h
index f48a85c377de..b6514c29563f 100644
--- a/include/linux/dsa/lan9303.h
+++ b/include/linux/dsa/lan9303.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct lan9303 {
 	bool phy_addr_sel_strap;
 	struct dsa_switch *ds;
 	struct mutex indirect_mutex; /* protect indexed register access */
+	struct mutex alr_mutex; /* protect ALR access */
 	const struct lan9303_phy_ops *ops;
 	bool is_bridged; /* true if port 1 and 2 are bridged */
 
-- 
2.14.1