[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOFm3uG=i3gOnKEMEPNii070+pB7Aqt2GmxgB5G0DCfGzhCkZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:19:33 +0100
From: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Rick Altherr <raltherr@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
julien.thierry@....com, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] arm: npcm: add basic support for Nuvoton BMCs
Brendan,
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
> Any update on this?
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Brendan Higgins
> <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
>> Adds basic support for the Nuvoton NPCM750 BMC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>
>> Tested-by: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>
>> Tested-by: Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>
<snip>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Nuvoton Technology corporation.
>> + * Copyright 2017 Google, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
Have you considered using the new SPDX ids here instead of the
traditional license boilerplate?
This could come out this way:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
// Copyright (c) 2017 Nuvoton Technology corporation.
// Copyright 2017 Google, Inc.
It is shorter and simpler, with a better code/comments ratio.
And if you wonder about why using C++ style comment, please check
Linus posts on the topic, as well as Thomas doc patches.
Thank you for your kind consideration!
--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
Powered by blists - more mailing lists