[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0inHMCLGyPaAeuJNo2VH7f3Th0KdpT2UkPBCsvrSDi0gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 23:19:51 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/7] device property: Introduce a common API to fetch
device match data
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:17:52PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 12/7/2017 7:40 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:04:48PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> >> @@ -101,6 +103,8 @@ struct fwnode_operations {
>> >> (*graph_get_port_parent)(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
>> >> int (*graph_parse_endpoint)(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>> >> struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint);
>> >> + void *(*get_match_data)(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>> >> + struct device *dev);
>> >
>> > You can make dev const, too.
>> >
>>
>> done, I couldn't change device_get_match_data() parameter const due to
>> dev_fwnode() function.
>>
>> from /local/mnt/workspace/projects/caf/kernel/drivers/base/property.c:13:
>>
>> /local/mnt/workspace/projects/caf/kernel/drivers/base/property.c:1341:39: warning: passing argument 1 of 'dev_fwnode' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
>> return fwnode_call_ptr_op(dev_fwnode(dev), device_get_match_data,
>
> Right. Makes sense.
>
> I guess it's not perhaps worth it introducing dev_fwnode_const just for
> this. devices are seldom if ever const anyway.
They cannot be const. Had they been const, it wouldn't have been
possible to register them even. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists