lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1512629963.960.34.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 06 Dec 2017 22:59:23 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add check for tag Co-Developed-by

On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 07:55 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 10:34:26PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 11:59 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > > Recently signature tag Co-Developed-by was added to the
> > > kernel (Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst). checkpatch.pl doesn't know
> > > about it yet. All prior tags used all lowercase characters except for first
> > > character. Checks for this format had to be re-worked to allow for the
> > > new tag.
> > > 
> > > Add checkpatch checks for Co-Developed-by tag.
> > 
> > []
> > > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > @@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ our $signature_tags = qr{(?xi:
> > >  	Reviewed-by:|
> > >  	Reported-by:|
> > >  	Suggested-by:|
> > > +	Co-Developed-by:|
> > 
> > I think the extra hyphenate form is poor at best.
> > Codeveloped-by: should be the only form.
> 
> That's not what Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst says, sorry.

So what? That's easy to change.

> So Tobin's patch is correct.

Not to me.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ