linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] doc: convert printk-formats.txt to rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <72D12001-6F2A-4B8F-A742-401F5E289904@darmarit.de>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 08:44:37 +0100
From:   Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Murray <amurray@...-data.co.uk>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: convert printk-formats.txt to rst

> Am 07.12.2017 um 06:49 schrieb Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc>:
> 
> Documentation/printk-formats.txt is a candidate for conversion to
> ReStructuredText format. Some effort has already been made to do this
> conversion even thought the suffix is currently .txt
> 
[...]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc>
> ---
> 
> v2:
> - Revert to use ASCII table.
> - Implement (or revert) changes as suggested by Randy Dunlap.
> - Change file location to core-api/ (inc required index changes) 
> - Remove some of the double back ticks.
> 
> Last two suggested by Jonathan Corbet.
> 

Hm, can't apply v2 on Jon's docs-next .. is the v2 patch on top of your v1?

If so, please take a look at our fabulously ;) documentation ..

 https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

"""
When you submit or resubmit a patch or patch series, include the complete patch description and justification for it. Don’t just say that this is version N of the patch (series). Don’t expect the subsystem maintainer to refer back to earlier patch versions or referenced URLs to find the patch description and put that into the patch. I.e., the patch (series) and its description should be self-contained. This benefits both the maintainers and reviewers. Some reviewers probably didn’t even receive earlier versions of the patch.

"""

-- Markus --