[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee4ad6c7-9d5e-bd66-4738-148dddb69ef5@i2se.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:14:33 +0100
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Mikhail Shvetsov <lameli67@...il.com>
Cc: eric@...olt.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, goudapatilk@...il.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lameli67@...dex.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] codestyle issue fixed drivers/staging/vc04_services
Hello Mikhail,
Am 07.12.2017 um 08:47 schrieb Mikhail Shvetsov:
> From: Mike <lameli67@...il.com>
please provide your full name and a changelog. Also the subject should
start with something like "staging: vchiq_arm:".
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike <lameli67@...il.com>
> ---
> .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_kern_lib.c | 64 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_kern_lib.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_kern_lib.c
> index 34f746db19cd..d21bb154f78c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_kern_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_kern_lib.c
> @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ vchiq_blocking_bulk_transfer(VCHIQ_SERVICE_HANDLE_T handle, void *data,
> unsigned int size, VCHIQ_BULK_DIR_T dir);
>
> /****************************************************************************
> -*
> -* vchiq_initialise
> -*
> -***************************************************************************/
> + *
> + * vchiq_initialise
> + *
> + ***************************************************************************/
Instead of fixing the comment style, i prefer to drop this kind of
useless comments in a separate patch.
> #define VCHIQ_INIT_RETRIES 10
> VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_initialise(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T *instance_out)
> {
> @@ -80,7 +80,9 @@ VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_initialise(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T *instance_out)
> vchiq_log_trace(vchiq_core_log_level, "%s called", __func__);
>
> /* VideoCore may not be ready due to boot up timing.
> - It may never be ready if kernel and firmware are mismatched, so don't block forever. */
> + * It may never be ready if kernel and firmware are mismatched, so don't
> + * block forever.
> + */
> for (i = 0; i < VCHIQ_INIT_RETRIES; i++) {
> state = vchiq_get_state();
> if (state)
> @@ -93,7 +95,8 @@ VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_initialise(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T *instance_out)
> goto failed;
> } else if (i > 0) {
> vchiq_log_warning(vchiq_core_log_level,
> - "%s: videocore initialized after %d retries\n", __func__, i);
> + "%s: videocore initialized after %d retries\n",
> + __func__, i);
This isn't a comment, so it should be a separate patch.
> }
>
> instance = kzalloc(sizeof(*instance), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -121,10 +124,10 @@ VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_initialise(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T *instance_out)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vchiq_initialise);
>
> /****************************************************************************
> -*
> -* vchiq_shutdown
> -*
> -***************************************************************************/
> + *
> + * vchiq_shutdown
> + *
> + ***************************************************************************/
>
> VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_shutdown(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance)
> {
> @@ -169,10 +172,10 @@ VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_shutdown(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vchiq_shutdown);
>
> /****************************************************************************
> -*
> -* vchiq_is_connected
> -*
> -***************************************************************************/
> + *
> + * vchiq_is_connected
> + *
> + ***************************************************************************/
>
> static int vchiq_is_connected(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance)
> {
> @@ -180,10 +183,10 @@ static int vchiq_is_connected(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance)
> }
>
> /****************************************************************************
> -*
> -* vchiq_connect
> -*
> -***************************************************************************/
> + *
> + * vchiq_connect
> + *
> + ***************************************************************************/
>
> VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_connect(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance)
> {
> @@ -215,10 +218,10 @@ VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_connect(VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vchiq_connect);
>
> /****************************************************************************
> -*
> -* vchiq_add_service
> -*
> -***************************************************************************/
> + *
> + * vchiq_add_service
> + *
> + ***************************************************************************/
>
> VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_add_service(
> VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance,
> @@ -260,10 +263,10 @@ VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_add_service(
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vchiq_add_service);
>
> /****************************************************************************
> -*
> -* vchiq_open_service
> -*
> -***************************************************************************/
> + *
> + * vchiq_open_service
> + *
> + ***************************************************************************/
>
> VCHIQ_STATUS_T vchiq_open_service(
> VCHIQ_INSTANCE_T instance,
> @@ -414,8 +417,9 @@ vchiq_blocking_bulk_transfer(VCHIQ_SERVICE_HANDLE_T handle, void *data,
> if ((bulk->data != data) ||
> (bulk->size != size)) {
> /* This is not a retry of the previous one.
> - ** Cancel the signal when the transfer
> - ** completes. */
> + * Cancel the signal when the transfer
> + * completes.
> + */
> spin_lock(&bulk_waiter_spinlock);
> bulk->userdata = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&bulk_waiter_spinlock);
> @@ -441,7 +445,9 @@ vchiq_blocking_bulk_transfer(VCHIQ_SERVICE_HANDLE_T handle, void *data,
>
> if (bulk) {
> /* Cancel the signal when the transfer
> - ** completes. */
> + *
Please avoid this empty line.
Thanks
> + * completes.
> + */
> spin_lock(&bulk_waiter_spinlock);
> bulk->userdata = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&bulk_waiter_spinlock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists