linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] staging: pi433: Rename enum optionOnOff in rf69

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:41:15 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Marcus Wolf <marcus.wolf@...rthome-wolf.de>
Cc:     Simon Sandström <simon@...anor.nu>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux@...f-Entwicklungen.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] staging: pi433: Rename enum optionOnOff in
 rf69_enum.h

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:17:32AM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote:
> To be honest, I am a little bit astonished about that question. Don't you do
> a regression test after such a redesign? I would be a little bit afraid to
> offer such redesign without testing.

He probably doesn't have the hardware...  That's fine.  Most patches to
staging are like this.  We have a pretty good track record for rarely
introducing bugs.

This patchset is pretty easy to review with confidence because it's
mostly just renames so there are only a few bits to review by hand.
I've attached the perl script I use for reviewing renames and indent
changes.

regards,
dan carpenter

View attachment "rename_rev.pl" of type "text/x-perl" (11926 bytes)