[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wp1y7trw.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:58:03 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
Cc: <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<tiwai@...e.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: rsnd: ssi: remove unnesessary period_pos
Hi Jiada
> Further more, if the passed 'byte' amount to
> rsnd_ssi_pointer_update() is more than byte_per_period.
> the calculation of next_period_byte isn't correct.
Is it really happen ??
Basically, I have no objection about this patch,
but this explanation is very strange for me...
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists