linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 08/15] drm/sun4i: Add LVDS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOFm3uEpnBFUDBHK+SqQ-pGUPcWbGXNrWum4HRJ34tMtoX-2Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:14:27 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, plaes@...es.org,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        jernej.skrabec@...l.net,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/15] drm/sun4i: Add LVDS support

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> The TCON supports the LVDS interface to output to a panel or a bridge.
> Let's add support for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
[]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 NextThing Co
> + * Copyright (C) 2015-2017 Free Electrons
> + *
> + * Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + */

Maxime,

Would you consider using the new SPDX ids instead of this fine legalese?
e.g. this as the top line:

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne