[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171207120352.4obvlu4cemagfom7@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:03:52 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/19] ASoC: tlv320aic31xx: Add short circuit
detection support
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:22:39PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 12/01/2017 09:32 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> >> This will report the interrupt as handled even if we didn't see an
> >> interrupt we understand which will break shared interrupt lines. At the
> >> very least we should log other interrupt sources numerically.
> > Okay, I think I can make that work by checking if no bits are set in the
> > interrupt regs and returning early if not, IRQ_NONE.
> This turned out to be more difficult than I expected, plus if I do
> handle an interrupt it doesn't mean the other device did not right? So
> this wouldn't fix shared lines as far as I can tell, but I don't
> register it as shared so this should be fine.
It'll mean that we don't offer the interrupt to anything else sharing
the line.
> As for your other suggestion of "log other interrupt sources
> numerically", could you explain this or point to an example of what you
> mean?
Just print out the bits that were set.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists