[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171207125645.662924122@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 13:57:20 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 096/109] dma-buf/sw_sync: clean up list before signaling the fence
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>
commit 3792b7c1a70815fe4e954221c096f9278638fd21 upstream.
If userspace already dropped its own reference by closing the sw_sync
fence fd we might end up in a deadlock where
dma_fence_is_signaled_locked() will trigger the release of the fence and
thus try to hold the lock to remove the fence from the list.
dma_fence_is_signaled_locked() tries to release/free the fence and hold
the lock in the process.
We fix that by changing the order operation and clean up the list and
rb-tree first.
v2: Drop fence get/put dance and manipulate the list first (Chris Wilson)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170729152217.8362-2-gustavo@padovan.org
[s/dma_fence/fence/g - gregkh]
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c
@@ -213,11 +213,21 @@ static void sync_timeline_signal(struct
obj->value += inc;
list_for_each_entry_safe(pt, next, &obj->pt_list, link) {
- if (!fence_is_signaled_locked(&pt->base))
+ if (!timeline_fence_signaled(&pt->base))
break;
list_del_init(&pt->link);
rb_erase(&pt->node, &obj->pt_tree);
+
+ /*
+ * A signal callback may release the last reference to this
+ * fence, causing it to be freed. That operation has to be
+ * last to avoid a use after free inside this loop, and must
+ * be after we remove the fence from the timeline in order to
+ * prevent deadlocking on timeline->lock inside
+ * timeline_fence_release().
+ */
+ fence_signal_locked(&pt->base);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&obj->lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists