linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: stm32: Fixes multibyte transfer for STM32F4 I2C controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:23:52 +0100
From:   Pierre Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@...com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Radosław Pietrzyk <radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com>
CC:     Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: stm32: Fixes multibyte transfer for STM32F4 I2C
 controller


I do believe some investigation has to be done prior merging this patch.
The impact is genuine and has to be tested thoroughly before granting an ack.

Thus I prefer having a better understanding of the issue.
I will try to work on this later on.

Regards


On 12/07/2017 11:52 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:45:43PM +0200, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
>> I'm afraid that didn't help and the problem still exists even with
>> those patches applied.
> 
> So, my reading is: There is an issue which needs to be investigated?
> Does applying the patch make sense until the issue is fully understood?
>