[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y3mf8f1j.fsf@ni.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 20:09:28 -0600
From: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: PI futexes + lock stealing woes
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:56:05AM -0600, Julia Cartwright wrote:
>
>> fixup_owner() used to have additional seemingly relevant checks in place
>> that were removed 73d786bd043eb ("futex: Rework inconsistent
>> rt_mutex/futex_q state").
>
> *groan*... yes. I completely missed that extra case also applied to
> requeue_pi (requeue always did hurt my brain).
FWIW I have been testing for about two days now with the fixup_owner()
hunk of 73d786bd043eb ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q
state") reverted. So far it hasn't hit the race/deadlock. It normally
takes around 8 hours to reproduce.
I've also tried Julia's msleep() trick for expanding the race window for
the last 4 hours or so of testing and it seems to be still going.
Thanks,
Gratian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists