[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mc1MvDcZO=Lr-v33G-bFR1ds-uLs1ra2XO68g4vqSkafw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:21:54 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@...x.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, nsekhar@...com,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Divagar Mohandass <divagar.mohandass@...el.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: add eeprom "at24,no-read-rollover" property
2017-12-07 15:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>:
>> at24 is not a vendor prefix. Either this is atmel specific and you want
>> atmel,no-read-rollover or it is for all vendors at24 compatible eeproms
>> and you want at24-no-read-rollover. Or just drop the at24 if this
>> binding is in fact for just at24 eeproms as none of the other properties
>> has at24 in them.
>
> Bartosz, shall I rename
> at24,no-read-rollover -> no-read-rollover ?
Yes, please.
Thanks,
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists