linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNARWZ-OSV+USgzuQCK4H1UL3pvY-NRDVN2665tuaOgqkSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 00:31:28 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com>
Cc:     Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Vinícius Tinti <viniciustinti@...il.com>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-12-07 3:14 GMT+09:00 Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com>:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>> Just one question to Paolo:
>>
>>   If some change like firmware removal happens in the future,
>>   patching for snapcraft is necessary?
>>     (i.e. users are required to upgrade snapcraft from --edge ?)
>>
>> I guess the answer is yes, because "plugin: kernel" needs to know
>> the kernel-build system internal.
>
> Well, in this case, i had to fix the 'kernel-with-firmware' option to
> skip the 'firmware_install' step since
> we took it by default - let's say that in the future the
> 'modules_install' target is removed or change name,
> then i'll have to patch snapcraft.
>
> Wrt updating from -edge, i told you to take it from there because snap
> packages land there more often and more quickly
> compared to the canonicaldeb  archive, so from a developer perspective
> it's easier&quicker to iterate over it, but sooner
> or later (e.g. once snapcraft 2.36.1 reaches the snap -stable
> channel), it will be copied to the deb archive too -
> IOW, you would get using apt-get only too.
> --


I will pick up this for v4.16-rc1.
It sounds like this target is a bit fragile, but let's see.
I hope a breakage will not happen...


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada