linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] remove some of unneeded kallsyms includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171208142442.7c09406d7f0bc3d2c1bfe411@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:24:42 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] remove some of unneeded kallsyms includes

On Fri,  8 Dec 2017 11:56:07 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:

> 	A small patch set that removes some kallsyms includes
> here and there. Mostly those kallsyms includes are leftovers:
> printk() gained %pS/%pF modifiers support some time ago, so
> print_symbol() and friends became sort of unneeded [along with
> print_fn_descriptor_symbol() deprecation], thus some of the
> users were converted to pS/pF. This patch set just cleans up
> that convertion.
> 
> 	We still have a number of print_symbol() users [which
> must be converted to ps/pf, print_symbol() uses a stack buffer
> KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN to do what printk(ps/pf) can do], but this is
> out of scope.
> 
> 	I compile tested the patch set; but, as always and
> usual, would be great if 0day build robot double check it.

I grabbed everything and shall drop any patches which later turn up in
the various subsystem trees.