linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/cma: manage the memory of the CMA area by using the ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171208143719.901b742d5238b829edac3b14@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:37:19 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     js1304@...il.com
Cc:     Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/cma: manage the memory of the CMA area by
 using the ZONE_MOVABLE

On Fri,  1 Dec 2017 16:53:03 +0900 js1304@...il.com wrote:

> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> 
> v2
> o previous failure in linux-next turned out that it's not the problem of
> this patchset. It was caused by the wrong assumption by specific
> architecture.
> 
> lkml.kernel.org/r/20171114173719.GA28152@...mide.com
> 
> o add missing cache flush to the patch "ARM: CMA: avoid double mapping
> to the CMA area if CONFIG_HIGHMEM = y"
> 
> 
> This patchset is the follow-up of the discussion about the
> "Introduce ZONE_CMA (v7)" [1]. Please reference it if more information
> is needed.
> 
> In this patchset, the memory of the CMA area is managed by using
> the ZONE_MOVABLE. Since there is another type of the memory in this zone,
> we need to maintain a migratetype for the CMA memory to account
> the number of the CMA memory. So, unlike previous patchset, there is
> less deletion of the code.
> 
> Otherwise, there is no big change.
> 
> Motivation of this patchset is described in the commit description of
> the patch "mm/cma: manage the memory of the CMA area by using
> the ZONE_MOVABLE". Please refer it for more information.
> 
> This patchset is based on linux-next-20170822 plus
> "mm/page_alloc: don't reserve ZONE_HIGHMEM for ZONE_MOVABLE".

mhocko had issues with that patch which weren't addressed?
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170914132452.d5klyizce72rhjaa@dhcp22.suse.cz

> Thanks.
> 
> [1]: lkml.kernel.org/r/1491880640-9944-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@....com