[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEbi=3fDHzLv4udGJxFXvb4yxNgs8j81Jm9vm_3e9swjq4hM8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:26:42 +0800
From: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greentime <greentime@...estech.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/35] nds32: MMU fault handling and page table management
2017-12-08 0:40 GMT+08:00 Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:27:53PM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:
>> +void do_page_fault(unsigned long entry, unsigned long addr,
>> + unsigned int error_code, struct pt_regs *regs)
> [snip]
>> + /*
>> + * If we're in an interrupt or have no user
>> + * context, we must not take the fault..
>> + */
>> + if (unlikely(in_atomic() || !mm))
>
> Broken. in_atomic() is wrong here - it should be faulthandler_disabled().
Thanks.
I will include <linux/uaccess.h> and replace in_atomic() with
faulthandler_disabled()
I will fix it in the next version patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists