linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] About MIPS/Loongson maintainance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:34:30 +0800
From:   Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To:     James Hogan <james.hogan@...s.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Rui Wang <wangr@...ote.com>, Binbin Zhou <zhoubb@...ote.com>,
        Ce Sun <sunc@...ote.com>, Yao Wang <wangyao@...ote.com>,
        Liangliang Huang <huangll@...ote.com>,
        Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@...ote.com>,
        Zhangjin Wu <wuzhangjin@...il.com>, r@....cc,
        zhoubb.aaron@...il.com, huanglllzu@....com, 513434146@...com,
        1393699660@...com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] About MIPS/Loongson maintainance

On 2017-12-08 Fri 07:51 +0000，James Hogan Wrote：
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:01:46PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > Also we're going to separate code between
> > Loongson2 and Loongson3 since they are becoming more and more
> > identical.
> 
> Do you mean you want to combine them?

Sorry, my fault. They're become more and more different and  I'm going
to separate loongson64 into loongson2 and loongson3.

> 
> > But It will cause a lot of changes under march of loongson64
> >  that currently maintaining by linux-mips community. Send plenty of
> > patches to mailing list would not be a wise way to do that. So we
> > can
> > PR these changes to linux-next directly and PR to linux-mips before
> > merge window.

So we can commit by ourselves after subsystem's review to reduce linux-
mips's workload. 
Since Huacai Chen said that we won't send PR, maybe it's unnecessary.
Thanks.

> For the avoidance of doubt, a pull request would not excempt you from
> needing your patches properly reviewed on the mailing lists first.
> 
> And quoting Stephen's boilerplate response to linux-next additions:
> > Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-
> > next.  As
> > you may know, this is not a judgement of your code.  The purpose of
> > linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
> > conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.
> > 
> > You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your
> > tree/series have
> > been:
> >      * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the
> > Contributor's
> >         Signed-off-by,
> >      * posted to the relevant mailing list,
> >      * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem
> > tree),
> >      * successfully unit tested, and
> >      * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
> > 
> > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask
> > him
> > to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
> 
> Cheers
> James
-- 
Jiaxun Yang