[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1a67ce0-301a-3028-58f0-293235b88f97@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 17:05:56 -0800
From: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] media: imx: Add better OF graph support
On 12/07/2017 03:23 PM, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
>
> On 12/04/2017 05:44 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> <snip>
>>
>> Of course, any such simplification can also be done after this series
>> has
>> been applied, but I don't know what your thoughts are on this.
>
> I do prefer the sub-notifier approach to discovering fwnodes, so yes I
> would
> like to switch to this.
>
> Since it is a distinct change (using sub-notifiers instead of
> recursive graph
> walk), I would prefer to get this series applied first, and then
> switch to
> sub-notifiers as distinct patches afterwards.
>
> Let me submit a v2 of this series first however. There are some minor
> changes I
> would like to make so that the up-coming sub-notifier patches are
> cleaner.
>
Hans,
Never mind, the sub-notifier patches should be fairly clean. I won't
submit a
v2 of this series unless it is requested by reviewers.
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists