linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tpmdd tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171208104633.rnwemhajfp3uvqmc@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 12:46:33 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tpmdd tree with Linus' tree

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:25:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tpmdd tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   MAINTAINERS
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   60fdb44a23cb ("MAINTAINERS: update TPM driver infrastructure changes")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   510230d28445 ("tpm: Update MAINTAINERS for Jason Gunthorpe")
> 
> from the tpmdd tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Sorry, I'll remove this commit up until security tree is updated to
4.5-rcX.

/Jarkko