linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k1xxqk8s.fsf@kerf.amer.corp.natinst.com>
Date:   Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:04:19 -0600
From:   Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@...com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex


Peter Zijlstra writes:

> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:02:40PM -0600, Gratian Crisan wrote:
>
>> Yep ... looks good to me. I've been running two targets with the
>> original reproducer for 8 hours now plus a target running the C test.
>> All of them are still going.
>> 
>> I'm going to let them run overnight to make sure but I'm going to call
>> it fixed.
>
> Assuming nothing bad happens; find below the patch with a Changelog
> attached.

Looks good after overnight testing. Thank you so much.

-Gratian