[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171208.112825.301687304435692797.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:28:25 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: laoar.shao@...il.com
Cc: marcelo.leitner@...il.com, songliubraving@...com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
bgregg@...flix.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next] net/tcp: trace all TCP/IP state transition
with tcp_set_state tracepoint
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:50:44 +0800
> 2017-12-08 23:42 GMT+08:00 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>> From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
>> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:40:23 +0800
>>
>>> It will looks like these,
>>>
>>> if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
>>> __tcp_set_state(newsk, TCP_SYN_RECV);
>>> else
>>> newsk->sk_state = TCP_SYN_RECV;
>>>
>>>
>>> if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
>>> __tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
>>> else
>>> sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
>>>
>>> if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP)
>>> tcp_state_store(sk, state);
>>> else
>>> sk_state_store(sk, state);
>>>
>>>
>>> Some redundant code.
>>>
>>> IMO, put these similar code into a wrapper is more nice.
>>
>> I think this discussion and how ugly this is getting shows that
>> tracing the state transitions of a socket is perhaps not best as a TCP
>> specific feature.
>
> Do you mean that tcp_set_state tracepoint should be replaced with
> sk_set_state tracepoint and move that tracepoint to
> trace/events/sock.h ?
Yes, something like that.
It will avoid all of these protocol specific checks and weird
dependencies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists