[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171208193015.mhkvpws66vmg37bc@dtor-ws>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:30:15 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] HID: use BIT macro instead of plain integers for
flags
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 03:28:17PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> This can lead to some hairy situation with the developer losing
> a day or two realizing that 4 should be after 2, not 3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> ---
Please add
#include <linux/bitops.h>
to make sure we have definition if BIT(), otherwise
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Thanks!
>
> new in v2
>
> include/linux/hid.h | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hid.h b/include/linux/hid.h
> index a62ee4a609ac..421b62b77c69 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hid.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hid.h
> @@ -494,13 +494,13 @@ struct hid_output_fifo {
> char *raw_report;
> };
>
> -#define HID_CLAIMED_INPUT 1
> -#define HID_CLAIMED_HIDDEV 2
> -#define HID_CLAIMED_HIDRAW 4
> -#define HID_CLAIMED_DRIVER 8
> +#define HID_CLAIMED_INPUT BIT(0)
> +#define HID_CLAIMED_HIDDEV BIT(1)
> +#define HID_CLAIMED_HIDRAW BIT(2)
> +#define HID_CLAIMED_DRIVER BIT(3)
>
> -#define HID_STAT_ADDED 1
> -#define HID_STAT_PARSED 2
> +#define HID_STAT_ADDED BIT(0)
> +#define HID_STAT_PARSED BIT(1)
>
> struct hid_input {
> struct list_head list;
> --
> 2.14.3
>
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists