[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWs2Vt2ws8ox8_9V+VYT35feq0sbx6Ped-VF8JvsmNLfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 12:49:18 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PTI 1/3] x86/pti: Vastly simplify pgd synchronization
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> From a high level, what finally allowed this to happen? Because
> kpti_add_user_map() all went away, including the LDT one?
>
Yes, exactly.
>
>> + if (pgdp_maps_userspace(pgdp)) {
>> /*
>> + * The user page tables get the full PGD,
>> + * accessible from userspace:
>> */
>> + kernel_to_user_pgdp(pgdp)->pgd = pgd.pgd;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If this is normal user memory, make it NX in the kernel
>> + * pagetables so that, if we somehow screw up and return to
>> + * usermode with the kernel CR3 loaded, we'll get a page
>> + * fault instead of allowing user code to execute with
>> + * the wrong CR3.
>> + *
>> + * As exceptions, we don't set NX if:
>> + * - this is EFI or similar, the kernel may execute from it
>> + * - we don't have NX support
>> + * - we're clearing the PGD (i.e. pgd.pgd == 0).
>> + */
>> + if ((pgd.pgd & _PAGE_USER) && (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX))
>> + pgd.pgd |= _PAGE_NX;
>
> I scratched my head for a sec to realize why you didn't need an explicit
> pgd.pgd==0 check. It's part of the _PAGE_USER check, which is a bit
> confusing. Could we do:
>
> if ((pgd.pgd & (_PAGE_USER|_PAGE_PRESENT)) &&
> (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX))
I assume you mean pgd.pgd & (_PAGE_USER|_PAGE_PRESENT) ==
(_PAGE_USER|_PAGE_PRESENT)?
>
> And change the comment:
>
> * As exceptions, we don't set NX fo:
> * - PGDs without _PAGE_USER: Assume this is for a weird in-kernel
> * user like EFI from which we may need to execute.
> * - PGDs withoout _PAGE_PRESENT: PGD is being cleared, must
> * not set _PAGE_NX
> * - we don't have NX support
>
>
>
>
>
>> } else {
>> /*
>> + * Changes to the high (kernel) portion of the kernelmode
>> + * page tables are not automatically propagated to the
>> + * usermode tables.
>> + *
>> + * Users should keep in mind that, unlike the kernelmode
>> + * tables, there is no vmalloc_fault equivalent for the
>> + * usermode tables. Top-level entries added to init_mm's
>> + * usermode pgd after boot will not be automatically
>> + * propagated to other mms.
>> */
>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING);
>> }
>> #endif
>
> How does the VSYSCALL page get into the user page tables now?
Fantastic question. I appear to be bad at testing. Lemme fix that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists